THAT WAS REALLY GOOD TO WATCH. YISHAI NAILED IT ON THE HEAD AS THAT GUY HIDES BEHIND THE MASK OF HUMAN RIGHTS ,YET HE COULD CARE LESS ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF JEWS AND ISRAELIS. IT AMAZES ME HOW HE CAN HONESTLY BELIEVE WHAT HE IS SAYING. GRETA JOB YISHAI YOU REALLY PRESENTED YOURSELF GREAT.
You make HaShem Proud. I am proud of you too. We all are proud of you. Keep up the great work. The Angels gave a standing ovation, blasting their Shofars, Trumpets, and Gan Eden shook.
I can't understand what possessed you to go on Al Jazeera, a bastion of hate that is just interested in using your name to promote a picture of fairness.
What's the point? If you're trying to reach Arabs, go on the Arabic version. If you're trying to reach Jews, go on an Israeli station.
Al Jazeera English is all about PR, and the deck was stacked against you by both the moderator and the other speaker.
I'm afraid that only the choir would see you as the victor in this battle. Everyone else sees $ for Al Jazeera.
YASHER KOACH Yishai! Chazak v'nischazeik! Tell it like it was, like it is, like it will be. Good job keeping the focus on the big picture despite the interviewer's attempt -- like the Western "news" media -- to take "settlers" out of context. Good point about how the Arab states have plenty of power it's not Israel that's the bully. Happy Chanukah, all the best to you, Malkah, and your littlest holy Flame.
It seems to me that the settlers did not coordinate their purchase with the israeli government, as they should have under the law. This is why the court did not wish to see evidence showing that the purchase was legitimate, because it is irrelevant to the fact that the purchase was not coordinated with the government as the law required. Do I understand this correctly?
10 Comments:
At December 7, 2008 at 11:19 PM ,
גיל רונן said...
But I am trying to bobul, bubulationeate, never mind, excuse me!
At December 8, 2008 at 12:05 AM ,
Anonymous said...
nice work. real nice.
At December 8, 2008 at 2:14 AM ,
Pinchas said...
Yishai, I don't think they will invite you back... you're not allowed to talk about the Bible!
At December 8, 2008 at 2:15 AM ,
Shimshon said...
Israel cannot allow a Jewish Intifada - No matter what your opinion is about the evacuation of Hebron.
At December 8, 2008 at 7:51 AM ,
Anonymous said...
THAT WAS REALLY GOOD TO WATCH. YISHAI NAILED IT ON THE HEAD AS THAT GUY HIDES BEHIND THE MASK OF HUMAN RIGHTS ,YET HE COULD CARE LESS ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF JEWS AND ISRAELIS. IT AMAZES ME HOW HE CAN HONESTLY BELIEVE WHAT HE IS SAYING. GRETA JOB YISHAI YOU REALLY PRESENTED YOURSELF GREAT.
At December 8, 2008 at 11:05 AM ,
Anonymous said...
Yishai -
You make HaShem Proud.
I am proud of you too.
We all are proud of you.
Keep up the great work.
The Angels gave a standing ovation, blasting their Shofars, Trumpets, and Gan Eden shook.
Uriel
At December 8, 2008 at 10:26 PM ,
Anonymous said...
Shimshon said...
"Israel cannot allow a Jewish Intifada - No matter what your opinion is about the evacuation of Hebron."
What is wrong with a Jewish intifada? Worked well for the Arabs.
At December 11, 2008 at 6:13 PM ,
Anonymous said...
I can't understand what possessed you to go on Al Jazeera, a bastion of hate that is just interested in using your name to promote a picture of fairness.
What's the point? If you're trying to reach Arabs, go on the Arabic version. If you're trying to reach Jews, go on an Israeli station.
Al Jazeera English is all about PR, and the deck was stacked against you by both the moderator and the other speaker.
I'm afraid that only the choir would see you as the victor in this battle. Everyone else sees $ for Al Jazeera.
At December 16, 2008 at 5:36 PM ,
Anonymous said...
YASHER KOACH Yishai! Chazak v'nischazeik! Tell it like it was, like it is, like it will be. Good job keeping the focus on the big picture despite the interviewer's attempt -- like the Western "news" media -- to take "settlers" out of context. Good point about how the Arab states have plenty of power it's not Israel that's the bully. Happy Chanukah, all the best to you, Malkah, and your littlest holy Flame.
At December 20, 2008 at 8:59 PM ,
rashkov said...
It seems to me that the settlers did not coordinate their purchase with the israeli government, as they should have under the law. This is why the court did not wish to see evidence showing that the purchase was legitimate, because it is irrelevant to the fact that the purchase was not coordinated with the government as the law required. Do I understand this correctly?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home