So why do yu take the reins and continue to spread hate? How can you accuse these women of being "man-hating" "childhaters" and do so calling them names and using inflammatory rhetoric? Why is it okay for you to play the hater?
I do not like people who cause a million children to be bombarded with rockets for a month and get traumatized for life, with an option for juvenile diabetes. You want me to love them? Please explain why I should. But get yourself a moniker first if it's not too much to ask.
Why you should? Because hate begets hate. Because the burden of allowing yourself to carry this hate and stress will cause more health problems than juvenile diabetes.
I had to read your article a few times to convince myself it wasn't satire. Are you really adopting a pro-"macho pig" stance? You seriously think Israel's problems are a result of a shift away from the fearing of our fathers? Fear??? They've "taken away his gun license"? Forgive my shock, but this is a position I have only heard advocated by wife-beaters in bad television movies-of-the-week on the Lifetime network.
I just don't see this atmosphere of man-hatred you suggest. No one is out to humiliate "the male icon." Tzedek, tzedek tirdof- the pursuit of Justice and redress of improprieties is to be applauded. Why blame the justice-seekers for wrongdoers being punished?
Is the use of the term "macho pig" part of the general love and gentleness you believe in? Is the colorful streotypization of men as wifebeaters part of your concept of tsedek and binah?
I quoted "macho pig" from your article. And I wasn't stereotyping men as wifebeaters. I was referring to a stereotype perpetrated by the American TV and film industry and comparing the ideals of the "bad guy" characters in those movies as the dominant controller in their families with the paternal role you advocate. (See Lifetime, "What's Love Got to Do With It," "Sleeping With The Enemy," "The Great Santini"...)
As for juvenile diabetes, I don't understand the logic. You are saying that these women are interfering with the status of the Middle East as a "violent, muscle- and testosterone-driven place" place where families "fear" the father. You also say that stress and fear have cause a spike in juvenile diabetes. So aren't you arguing for mor juvenile diabetes? I.e. the women should step back and allow the flourishing of fear and violence?
6 Comments:
At May 4, 2007 at 6:37 AM , Anonymous said...
So why do yu take the reins and continue to spread hate? How can you accuse these women of being "man-hating" "childhaters" and do so calling them names and using inflammatory rhetoric? Why is it okay for you to play the hater?
Kumah needs a good dose of love.
At May 5, 2007 at 8:14 PM , גיל רונן said...
I do not like people who cause a million children to be bombarded with rockets for a month and get traumatized for life, with an option for juvenile diabetes. You want me to love them? Please explain why I should. But get yourself a moniker first if it's not too much to ask.
At May 8, 2007 at 9:12 AM , Anonymous said...
Why you should? Because hate begets hate. Because the burden of allowing yourself to carry this hate and stress will cause more health problems than juvenile diabetes.
I had to read your article a few times to convince myself it wasn't satire. Are you really adopting a pro-"macho pig" stance? You seriously think Israel's problems are a result of a shift away from the fearing of our fathers? Fear??? They've "taken away his gun license"? Forgive my shock, but this is a position I have only heard advocated by wife-beaters in bad television movies-of-the-week on the Lifetime network.
I just don't see this atmosphere of man-hatred you suggest. No one is out to humiliate "the male icon." Tzedek, tzedek tirdof- the pursuit of Justice and redress of improprieties is to be applauded. Why blame the justice-seekers for wrongdoers being punished?
I think I will adopt "Binah" as my moniker.
At May 8, 2007 at 12:00 PM , גיל רונן said...
Is the use of the term "macho pig" part of the general love and gentleness you believe in? Is the colorful streotypization of men as wifebeaters part of your concept of tsedek and binah?
At May 8, 2007 at 12:25 PM , גיל רונן said...
And I love how you smoothly brushed away the subject of juvenile diabetes. Beautifully evil, that was.
At May 8, 2007 at 3:52 PM , Binah said...
I quoted "macho pig" from your article. And I wasn't stereotyping men as wifebeaters. I was referring to a stereotype perpetrated by the American TV and film industry and comparing the ideals of the "bad guy" characters in those movies as the dominant controller in their families with the paternal role you advocate. (See Lifetime, "What's Love Got to Do With It," "Sleeping With The Enemy," "The Great Santini"...)
As for juvenile diabetes, I don't understand the logic. You are saying that these women are interfering with the status of the Middle East as a "violent, muscle- and testosterone-driven place" place where families "fear" the father. You also say that stress and fear have cause a spike in juvenile diabetes. So aren't you arguing for mor juvenile diabetes? I.e. the women should step back and allow the flourishing of fear and violence?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home